Binbin's Cabin is built mainly for myself. If you like it, please come back often. But please leave with nothing left, if you don't like to be here.

Saturday, December 23, 2006

Mikio Sato--Wolf Prize Winner in 2002/3

Mikio Sato (Japanese: 佐藤 幹夫 Sato Mikio; born April 18, 1928) is a Japanese mathematician, working in what he calls algebraic analysis. He studied at the University of Tokyo, and then did graduate study in physics as a student of Shin'ichiro Tomonaga. From 1970 Sato has been professor at the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, of Kyoto University.

He is known for his innovative work in a number of fields, such as prehomogeneous vector spaces and Bernstein-Sato polynomials; and particularly for his hyperfunction theory. This initially appeared as an extension of the ideas of distribution theory; it was soon connected to the local cohomology theory of Grothendieck, for which it was an independent origin, and to expression in terms of sheaf theory. It led further to the theory of microfunctions, interest in microlocal aspects of linear partial differential equations and Fourier theory such as wave fronts, and ultimately to the current developments in D-module theory. Part of that is the modern theory of holonomic systems: PDEs over-determined to the point of having finite-dimensional spaces of solutions.

He also contributed basic work to non-linear soliton theory, with the use of Grassmannians of infinite dimension. In number theory he is known for the Sato-Tate conjecture on L-functions.

He received the Schock Prize in 1997, and the Wolf Prize in 2003.

His Erdős number is 4.


This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia.

From: http://www.answers.com/topic/mikio-sato

More......

Daily Inspirational Quote For Dec 23, 2006.

For a long time it had seemed to me that life was about to begin — real life. But there was always some obstacle in the way, something to be gotten through first, some unfinished business, time still to be served, a debt to be paid. Then life would begin. At last it dawned on me that these obstacles were my life.

More......

Friday, December 22, 2006

John Tate--Wolf Prize Winner in 2002/3

John Torrence Tate, born March 13, 1925 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, is an American mathematician, distinguished for many fundamental contributions in algebraic number theory and related areas in algebraic geometry. He wrote a Ph.D. at Princeton in 1950 as a student of Emil Artin, was at Harvard University 1954-1990, and is now at the University of Texas at Austin.

Tate's thesis, on the analytic properties of the class of L-functions introduced by Erich Hecke, is one of the relatively few such dissertations that have become a by-word. In it the methods, novel for that time, of Fourier analysis on groups of adeles, were worked out to recover Hecke's results.

Subsequently Tate worked with Emil Artin to give a treatment of class field theory based on cohomology of groups, explaining the content as the Galois cohomology of idele classes, and introduced Tate cohomology groups. In the following decades Tate extended the reach of Galois cohomology: Tate-Poitou duality, abelian varieties, the Tate-Shafarevich group, and relations with algebraic K-theory.

He made a number of individual and important contributions to p-adic theory: the Lubin-Tate local theory of complex multiplication of formal groups; rigid analytic spaces; the 'Tate curve' parametrisation for certain p-adic elliptic curves; p-divisible (Tate-Barsotti) groups. Many of his results were not immediately published and were written up by Jean-Pierre Serre. They collaborated on a major published paper on good reduction of abelian varieties.

The Tate conjectures are the equivalent for étale cohomology of the Hodge conjecture. They relate to the Galois action on the l-adic cohomology of an algebraic variety, identifying a space of 'Tate cycles' (the fixed cycles for a suitably Tate-twisted action) that conjecturally picks out the algebraic cycles. A special case of the conjectures, which are open in the general case, was involved in the proof of the Mordell conjecture by Gerd Faltings.

Tate has had a profound influence on the development of number theory through his role as a PhD advisor. His students include Joe Buhler, Benedict Gross, Robert Kottwitz, James Milne, Carl Pomerance, Ken Ribet and Joseph H. Silverman.

He was awarded a Wolf Prize in Mathematics in 2002/3.

Selected publications

* J. Tate, Fourier analysis in number fields and Hecke's zeta functions (Tate's 1950 thesis), reprinted in Algebraic Number Theory by J. W. S. Cassels, A. Frohlich ISBN 0-12-163251-2

External links

* Tate's home page
* John Tate at the Mathematics Genealogy Project


This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia.

From: http://www.answers.com/topic/john-tate-1

More......

Daily Inspirational Quote For Dec 22, 2006.

Time is a traveler. Where did it go? It left, but it didn't leave you empty handed. No! It left you with the gift of beautiful memories, that you can keep in your heart for safe keeping, to cherish forever, and ever.

More......

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Grigory Margulis--Wolf Prize Winner in 2005

Gregori Aleksandrovich Margulis (first name often given as Gregory, Grigori or Grigory) (born February 24 1946) is a mathematician known for his far-reaching work on lattices in Lie groups, and the introduction of methods from ergodic theory into diophantine approximation. He was awarded a Fields Medal in 1978 and a Wolf Prize in 2005 (joining six mathematicians, up to 2004, who had received both prizes).

He was born into a Jewish family in Moscow, USSR. He studied at Moscow State University, starting research in ergodic theory under the supervision of Yakov Sinai. Early work with David Kazhdan produced the Kazhdan-Margulis theorem, a basic result on discrete groups. His superrigidity theorem from 1975 clarified a whole area of classical conjectures about the characterisation of arithmetic groups amongst lattices in Lie groups.

He was awarded the Fields Medal in 1978, but was not permitted to travel to Helsinki to accept in person. His position improved, and in 1979 he visited Bonn, and was later able to travel freely, though he still worked in a technical institute rather than a mathematics department. In 1991 he took a professorial position at Yale University.

In 1986, Margulis completed the proof of the Oppenheim conjecture on quadratic forms and diophantine approximation. This was a question that had been open for half a century, on which considerable progress had been made by the Hardy-Littlewood circle method; but to reduce the number of variables to the point of getting the best-possible results, the more structural methods from group theory proved decisive.

He has formulated a further program of research in the same direction, that includes the Littlewood conjecture. This has been widely influential.

In 2005, Margulis received the Wolf Prize for his contributions to lattice theory, and applications to ergodic theory, representation theory, number theory, combinatorics, and measure theory.


External links

* O'Connor, John J., and Edmund F. Robertson. "Grigory Margulis". MacTutor History of Mathematics archive.
* Grigory Margulis at the Mathematics Genealogy Project


This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia.

From: http://www.answers.com/topic/grigory-margulis

More......

Daily Inspirational Quote For Dec 21, 2006.

When you are inspired by some great purpose, some extraordinary project, all your thoughts break their bonds; your mind transcends limitations, your consciousness expands in every direction, and you find yourself in a new, great and wonderful world. Dormant forces, faculties and talents become alive, and you discover yourself to be a greater person by far than you ever dreamed yourself to be.

— Patanjali (c. 1st to 3rd century BC)


My Daily Motivation from Inspiration Line

More......

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Daily Inspirational Quote For Dec 20, 2006.

Cultivate your garden... Do not depend upon teachers to educate you ... follow your own bent, pursue your curiosity bravely, express yourself, make your own harmony… In the end, education, like happiness, is individual, and must come to us from life and from ourselves. There is no way; each pilgrim must make his own path. "Happiness," said Chamfort, "is not easily won; it is hard to find it in ourselves, and impossible to find it elsewhere.

More......

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Sergei Petrovich Novikov--Wolf Prize Winner in 2005

Sergei Petrovich Novikov (also Serguei) (Russian: Сергей Петрович Новиков) (born 20 March 1938) is a Russian mathematician, noted for work in both algebraic topology and soliton theory.

Early life

He was born in Gorky, Russian SFSR (now Nizhny Novgorod, Russia). Sergei grew up in a family of talented mathematicians. His father was Pyotr Sergeyevich Novikov, who gave the negative solution of the word problem for groups. His mother Ludmila and uncle Mstislav were also important mathematicians.

In 1955 Novikov entered the Moscow State University (graduated from it in 1960). Four years later he received the Moscow Mathematical Society Award for young mathematicians. In the same year he defended a dissertation for the Candidate of Science in Physics and Mathematics degree at the Moscow State University (it is equivalent to PhD). In 1965 he defended a dissertation for the Doctor of Science in Physics and Mathematics degree there. In 1966 he became the Corresponding member of the USSR Academy of Sciences.

Research in topology

His early work was in cobordism theory, in relative isolation. Among other advances he showed how the Adams spectral sequence, a powerful tool for proceeding from homology theory to the calculation of homotopy groups, could be adapted to the new (at that time) cohomology theory typified by cobordism and K-theory. This required the development of the idea of cohomology operations in the general setting, since the basis of the spectral sequence is the initial data of Ext functors taken with respect to a ring of such operations, generalising the Steenrod algebra. The resulting Adams-Novikov spectral sequence is now a basic tool in stable homotopy theory.

Novikov also carried out important research in geometric topology, being one of the pioneers with William Browder, Dennis Sullivan and Terry Wall of the surgery theory method for classifying high-dimensional manifolds. He proved the topological invariance of the rational Pontryagin classes, and posed the Novikov conjecture. This work was recognised by the award in 1970 of the Fields Medal. From about 1971 he moved to work in the field of isospectral flows, with connections to the theory of theta functions.

Later career

Since 1971 Novikov has worked at the Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics of the USSR Academy of Sciences. In 1981 he was elected a Full Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences (Russian Academy of Sciences since 1991). In 1982 Novikov was also appointed the Head of the Chair in Higher Geometry and Topology at the Moscow State University. In 1984 he was elected as a member of Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts.

As of 2004, Sergei is the Head of the Department of geometry and topology at the Steklov Mathematical Institute. He also teaches at the University of Maryland, College Park and is a Principal Researcher of the Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics in Moscow.

In 2005 Novikov was awarded the Wolf Prize for his contributions to algebraic topology, differential topology and to mathematical physics. He became one of just eight mathematicians who received both the Fields Medal and the Wolf Prize.

Awards

* Lenin Prize (1967)
* Fields Medal (1970)
* Lobachevsky International Prize (1981)
* Wolf Prize (2005)

External links

* Curriculum Vitae on the website of Steklov Mathematical Institute
* Biography (in Russian) on the website of Moscow State University
* O'Connor, John J., and Edmund F. Robertson. "Sergei Petrovich Novikov". MacTutor History of Mathematics archive.
* Sergei Petrovich Novikov at the Mathematics Genealogy Project


This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia.
Here is the beginning of my post.

From: http://www.answers.com/topic/sergei-petrovich-novikov

More......

Follow My Heart Lyrics

By Jay Sean

Friends used to say.....do things with your heart.......listen to your mind.....cause dreams aren't far OHHH....but you'll never see what lies ahead.....unless your stray from the path you dread


Chorus: I'm takin' a chance and i'm....livin' life on the edge.....won't take your advice this time....i'm doin' my thing instead.......

I know i gotta take a risk but i know what i want. cause my life i know i'm livin' it so i know what i need. don't care for those who i hated,i know what i want,don't know if i'm gonna make it but i'll follow my heart.


I know i gotta take a risk but i know what i want. cause my life i know i'm livin' it so i know what i need. don't care for those who i hated,i know what i want,don't know if i'm gonna make it but i'll follow my heart.

More......

Daily Inspirational Quote For Dec 19, 2006.

Each morning when I open my eyes I say to myself: I — not events — have the power to make me happy or unhappy today. I can choose which it shall be. Yesterday is dead, tomorrow hasn't arrived yet. I have just one day, today, and I'm going to be happy in it.

More......

Monday, December 18, 2006

Daily Inspirational Quote For Dec 18, 2006.

Each time a person stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, these ripples build a current
that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.

More......

Sunday, December 17, 2006

Some Helpful Links of Blogger Beta

Since I like Google, I created a Google blogger when I found it by accident. Soon the beautiful blogger templates indeed attracted me, and had me to make a decision to settle in blogger beta. Now I've built my own blogger, which named Binbin's Cabin, after several days' hard work. I'm satisfied with my Binbin's Cabin. Hey, how do you like it?

Although there are some templates you can pick for your blogger, it's not easy to build a satisfying personalized blogger beta at the beginning. I had to study the code for my template after looking for helps on line, and modified the Minima template by comparing with many other templates. Finally, I did it! Here I would like to thank to Pannasmontata for all her beautiful blogger templates. I used some background images of her templates. Thanks also to 色彩斑斓. I learned a lot from his blog.

If you're interested in blogger beta and would like to create one, I advise you to browse Blogger Help, 色彩斑斓 and Beautiful Beta. You may find more helps on the websites below:

Feedburner Beautiful Beta
Testing Blogger Beta
Hackosphere
Freshblog
Phydeaux3
Stubborn Fanatic
Hoctro's Place
Bloggerhacks
Bloggeratto
PurpleMoggy's Blog
爱css Zen Garden
Blogger University
Blogger Forum

And here you may find many beautiful templates on the websites below:

Blogger Templates
Free Blogspot Templates
Gecko & Fly
Free Blogger Templates
Thur's Templates
Blogger Templates org

More......

Follow your nose

Alice Shih-hou Huang
Nature 428, 221-222 (11 March 2004)

Alice Shih-hou Huang draws on her own experience to highlight the many careers and opportunities open to scientists in the West and in China.

When I visited Beijing a few years ago, I asked the young people I was talking to to name a twentieth-century hero. They did not name a politician, movie star or a millionaire; they named the scientist Albert Einstein.

Scientific research is now considered one of the most prestigious occupations in China — with a reputation to rival that of the ancient imperial scholars. Historically, parents identified their brightest child and prepared them for intellectual pursuits by hiring tutors. After successfully completing a series of national exams, the brightest of them were included in the emperor's court as valued advisers. Such exalted levels were only achieved after many lonely hours spent studying and practising calligraphy.

Science is now attracting the same calibre of students, but those advocating this discipline often know little about modern research. Gone are the days of rote learning, now scientists are equipped with a wide range of skills, from problem solving to communication. These accomplishments mak students and researchers ideal for many careers. If you're brave and follow your instincts, there are amazing opportunities open to young scientists — in China and around the world.

Before offering advice to young people wishing to become scientists, we should ask why this area is so attractive. Parents encourage their children into this field because it is a respected profession, with low unemployment. Students, thinking of well-known scientists, expect fame and fortune, and teachers direct students into science when they see pupils with rational and quantitative capabilities, believing that these attributes will be rewarded.

New skills

But those advocating science still often see it as a technical trade that requires students to memorize endless facts. In reality, there is too much information for such an approach to be useful. Also, problems that involve massive quantities of data are much easier and more accurately solved by computer than by a researcher laboriously working through the information.

Technical expertise and 'good hands' are still valued in the experimental sciences, but training in scientific thinking, priority setting, problem solving and clear communication is just as important for success in the international scientific arena.

There is no longer a rigid path to success. To face this new world, scientists have to be flexible during their training and throughout their careers. They must be open to new opportunities and be willing to move to where the best jobs are.

When I started studying medicine, I hardly knew what to expect. In fact, I could not have imagined the life I am leading now. Ever since I was in Kweiyang (southwest China, Kweichow province) as a young child, I admired the missionary doctors and thought that the most wonderful thing I could do when I grew up would be to cure diseases and save lives.

When I had the chance to enter Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland, I grabbed it. But it wasn't very long until sick patients with bedsores and the time-consuming, repetitive boredom of dealing with common illnesses took away any romantic notions I had about medicine. Research to uncover the causes of illnesses and find new ways to combat them seemed much more exciting. At the time, new PhD programmes aimed at medical students were being developed, and I jumped at this chance.

Upon entering the programme and carrying out serious research for the first time, I knew I had found something I was better suited to, and that I loved. Spending the rest of my days in a lab working on viruses would have fulfilled my dreams.

I grew viruses, purified them and counted them by observing their indirect effects on cells grown in a single layer in a Petri dish. In one of my first experiments, in which I was purifying viruses, I discovered a separate subclass of viral particle that was defective and could interfere with the growth of the standard virus1. This was very exciting: a mutant particle such as this could be used to control viral diseases, especially those of plants. Its properties so intrigued me that I did not finish the requirements for the MD degree after I received my PhD.

One day, the head of the lab challenged me to become a professor. This thought had never crossed my mind, because I saw so few women professors, although there were many female researchers. This was a new goal.

I continued to enjoy the research, but I took on extra responsibilities: teaching, being a member of various university committees, leading a division studying infectious diseases, and providing advice to numerous non-profit organizations and government agencies. After a while, I was promoted to a tenured professorship at Harvard Medical School, but as much as I enjoyed it, I wondered what to do next.

The dean advised me that being a professor is the perfect job, with considerable freedom and power, especially in the United States. Professors often keep working and maintain their own lab and students until they are well into their 80s, so long as they obtain independent funding from government or non-profit agencies.

But the long scholarly life was not for me. I was sure that I could continue to produce good research, but I also realized that the money I obtained for my lab would probably be better used by a younger investigator with fresher ideas. I looked around for an alternative and was attracted by research administration.

When I moved from Boston to New York, an opportunity to become dean of science at New York University was offered to me. Although I was supported by a Merit Award from the National Institutes of Health at the time, I was able to explore the new administrative role together with my research for a three-year period.

Now as senior councilor for external relations, a part-time position, I coordinate different areas of science and promote ideas at the frontier of more than one discipline. Also, I vicariously enjoy the success of the next generation of scientists whom I able to help. To nominate worthy colleagues for promotion or awards is another gratifying experience.

The number of consultations both within the university and externally continues to increase. They come from institutions as diverse as universities, foreign governments and investment groups. In addition, I receive many invitations to give talks on career development, science policy and diversity from professional groups. Unlike research, which is a very competitive and relentless, my activities take place at a more leisurely pace, so that there is time for family interactions, travel and new hobbies.

Instinctively right

It is not unusual for scientists these days to follow different career paths. Many go into academic administration or into various biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. An extreme alternative is going into non-profit advocacy: an example being the molecular biologist, Michael Jacobson, who is the founding director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, based in Washington DC, which protects the consumer by examining prepared foods to ensure that their ingredients are properly identified and healthy.

Other scientists, especially in developing countries, have gone into politics and, either by election or appointment, become high-ranking government officials.

My parents were unhappy when I did not complete my initial training as a doctor, but by following my nose and knowing my own strengths, I made the right decision for me.

To those readers who are more established in their careers and responsible for the education of scientists, I say that it is imperative that the training their students receive should be more than just technical and limited to a narrow field of science. Instead, they should develop the ability to chose an important problem, ask the right questions and design hypotheses — all essential tools for scientists. Young scientists should be encouraged to explore new paths and to have the confidence to follow their instincts.

If you are an aspiring young scientist in China, you are entering a wonderful career, full of all sorts of possibilities. You may end up in academia, but you may also end up working in areas such as financial investment, journalism or philanthropy. Do not limit yourself. A science background prepares you for all these possibilities. Do not bind your feet to prevent your own progress.

-----------------------------------------------
Alice Shih-hou Huang is senior councilor for external relations and faculty associate in biology at the California Institute of Technology, Mail Code 1-9, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.

References
Huang, A. S. & Baltimore, D. Nature 226, 325–327 (1970).


More......

My favorite photo

Time: December, 16, 2006
Site: At the doorway of my cabin

This is my favorite photo.
Would do you like it?
Haha, I love this one!




More......

One of my photos

Time: June, 5, 2006
Site: In my cabin



More......

Friday, December 15, 2006

Steven Weinberg: Four golden lessons

NATURE VOL 426 27 NOVEMBER 2003


Steven Weinberg

When I received my undergraduate degree — about a hundred years ago — the physics literature seemed to me a vast, unexplored ocean, every part of which I had to chart before beginning any research of my own. How could I do anything without knowing everything that had already been done? Fortunately, in my first year of graduate school, I had the good luck to fall into the hands of senior physicists who insisted, over my anxious objections, that I must start doing research, and pick up what I needed to know as I went along. It was sink or swim. To my surprise, I found that this works. I managed to get a quick PhD — though when I got it I knew almost nothing about physics. But I did learn one big thing: that no one knows everything, and you don't have to.

Another lesson to be learned, to continue using my oceanographic metaphor, is that while you are swimming and not sinking you should aim for rough water. When I was teaching at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the late 1960s, a student told me that he wanted to go into general relativity rather than the area I was working on, elementary particle physics, because the principles of the former were well known, while the latter seemed like a mess to him. It struck me that he had just given a perfectly good reason for doing the opposite. Particle physics was an area where creative work could still be done. It really was a mess in the 1960s, but since that time the work of many theoretical and experimental physicists has been able to sort it out, and put everything (well, almost everything) together in a beautiful theory known as the standard model. My advice is to go for the messes — that's where the action is.

My third piece of advice is probably the hardest to take. It is to forgive yourself for wasting time. Students are only asked to solve problems that their professors (unless unusually cruel) know to be solvable. In addition, it doesn't matter if the problems are scientifically important — they have to be solved to pass the course. But in the real world, it's very hard to know which problems are important, and you never know whether at a given moment in history a problem is solvable. At the beginning of the twentieth century, several leading physicists, including Lorentz and Abraham, were trying to work out a theory of the electron. This was partly in order to understand why all attempts to detect effects of Earth's motion through the ether had failed. We now know that they were working on the wrong problem. At that time, no one could have developed a successful theory of the electron, because quantum mechanics had not yet been discovered. It took the genius of Albert Einstein in 1905 to realize that the right problem on which to work was the effect of motion on measurements of space and time. This led him to the special theory of relativity. As you will never be sure which are the right problems to work on, most of the time that you spend in the laboratory or at your desk will be wasted. If you want to be creative, then you will have to get used to spending most of your time not being creative, to being becalmed on the ocean of scientific knowledge.

Finally, learn something about the history of science, or at a minimum the history of your own branch of science. The least important reason for this is that the history may actually be of some use to you in your own scientific work.For instance, now and then scientists are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified models of science that have been proposed by philosophers from Francis Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper. The best antidote to the philosophy of science is a knowledge of the history of science.

More importantly, the history of science can make your work seem more worthwhile to you. As a scientist, you're probably not going to get rich. Your friends and relatives probably won't understand what you're doing. And if you work in a field like elementary particle physics, you won't even have the satisfaction of doing something that is immediately useful. But you can get great satisfaction by recognizing that your work in science is a part of history.

Look back 100 years, to 1903. How important is it now who was Prime Minister of Great Britain in 1903, or President of the United States? What stands out as really important is that at McGill University, Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy were working out the nature of radioactivity. This work (of course!) had practical applications, but much more important were its cultural implications. The understanding of radioactivity allowed physicists to explain how the Sun and Earth's cores could still be hot after millions of years. In this way, it removed the last scientific objection to what many geologists and paleontologists thought was the great age of the Earth and the Sun. After this, Christians and Jews either had to give up belief in the literal truth of the Bible or resign themselves to intellectual irrelevance. This was just one step in a sequence of steps from Galileo through Newton and Darwin to the present that, time after time, has weakened the hold of religious dogmatism. Reading any newspaper nowadays is enough to show you that this work is not yet complete. But it is civilizing work, of which scientists are able to feel proud.
__________________________________________
■ Steven Weinberg is in the Department of Physics, the University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712, USA. This essay is based on a commencement talk given by the author at the Science Convocation at McGill University in June 2003.

More......

Career Advice: Just do it

Any task gets easier once you're under way. Before long, you'll be surprised at how far you've come.
By Marty Nemko
From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, October 2005

I once asked a group of top executives how many of them consider themselves to be serious procrastinators. Just 25% raised a hand. But when I put that question to groups of unemployed job seekers, 80% of the hands went up. That's consistent with what I've found in my 18 years as a career coach: Too often, procrastination can kill a career. Do you find that you're always putting things off? If so, I've learned a few things about getting out of this rut.

School daze. Many people learn procrastination in school. They wait until the last minute to write a paper or to study for a test, but, thanks to grade inflation, they still end up with a decent grade. That gets them by until they land in higher-level jobs, where there's no such thing as grade inflation to bail them out of their bad habits. Knowing that putting things off may be rooted in patterns acquired during school should give procrastinators hope that they can change.

Some people procrastinate to avoid failure. That should be a warning that you need to get help or that a task is inappropriate. If too many tasks are inappropriate, it could be time to change jobs.

Others procrastinate because they're hedonists who try to avoid work, especially work imposed on them by others. They are often helped by realizing that they're more likely to achieve the pleasure they seek -- not to mention a higher salary -- by getting their work done, rather than living with the guilt of putting it off.

Whatever the cause, my clients find the following approach helpful in overcoming procrastination. Ask yourself, "Is it in my interest to start on this task now? And if not now, when?" There's always a moment, usually unconscious, when you decide whether to start a project. If you make that decision consciously, you'll often choose to start working right away. Picture the benefits of finishing the task. Imagine how good you'll feel not having to bring home last-minute work.

Once you've decided you want to do the job, ask yourself, ÒDo I know how to do it?Ó If not, seek help immediately -- for example, ask for assistance in developing a step-by-step plan for tackling the work. Seeing the whole project laid out in incremental steps can help you overcome inertia. And if the task seems insurmountable, begin with a single step -- open the book, pick up the phone, start typing, whatever.

Any task gets easier once you're under way. Just like climbing a mountain, taking those first steps builds momentum. Before long, you'll look down in surprise at how far you've come.

There's no need to be a perfectionist, especially when you're taking your first crack at a project. When writing a first draft, good is good enough. Just keep working until you've finished a rough version. Then go back and turn good into excellent.

Promise yourself a reward for completing the job, or use psychological incentives. When my wife was working on her dissertation, we hung a paper thermometer on the refrigerator, listing all the small steps required to complete the project. Each time she finished a step, we'd fill in that part of the thermometer with purple ink and celebrate. A simple idea, true, but seeing her progress reassured both of us.

Up against a wall. When you reach a difficult part of a job, don't consume too much time struggling. If you haven't made progress after a bit, chances are you won't. Get help from a co-worker or an outside expert. Sometimes even an Internet search may give you just the insight or idea you need to keep going.

At the end of my first session with a new client, I make it a point to ask, "What are the chances you'll do your homework?" If the answer is less than 95%, I recommend that the client try these cures for procrastination.

More......

Just Do It

Many times, I put off doing things that I want to do or have to do by looking for excuses. But almost each time, procrastination brings me into a difficult situation. On the contrary, I always find things are easy to do and get a great feeling when I do them in time. Then I got to this point: once I decide to do something and work out how to do, then the best thing is JUST DO IT!

I couldn't agree more to the quotations below, which is quoted from the book International Muscle Training:

If you put off things for too long, they can easily become uncontrollable. The longer you wait to tackle a problem, the more difficult it becomes. Don't waste time thinking about how difficult something is. Just take the advice in this passage.

Many people put off until tomorrow what they can do today. Thay always look for excuses to postpone doing something. In the end, it never gets done. If we leave things undone, we will eventually worry. This will cause unnecessary stress. Therefore, if you have this bad habit, it's best to get rid of it and do things as soon as possible.

But note that talk is easier than action. So JUST DO IT!

More......

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Set Yourself on Fire

------Larry Summers, Harvard President



This University is, above all, founded on a core conviction that ideas, their development, and their transmission are what is ultimately most important. Now, I' ve said that as President of Harvard, strengthening the undergraduate educational experience here is one of the most important priorities that I face. How can you get the most out of our time here?

As hard as it may be to imagine, in just 45 months, most of you will be Harvard alumni. And for 361 years, Harvard' s alumni have been literate, opinionated, and vocal chroniclers of their Harvard experience and what it has meant. I read this summer about how the great jurist, Oliver Wendcll Holmes said that he had been -- and these are his words -- set on fire in his freshman year by reading the essays of Emerson, If l had but one wish for each of you, it is that in the years ahead you be set on fire, that your mind be captured by some set of external questions, by some area of human understanding; that you develop a passion for understanding, for progressing, that is so central to successful people everywhere. This University and its faculty have no more important goal than helping you in this quest. How? It's hard to say. Fires can' t be controlled. Passions can' t be predicted or planned. You are all dlfferent.

I give this advice: First, follow your passion, not your calculation. What you will remember of your time here will be the special experiences, the things that really catch your imagination. Choose courses that cohere. Follow a program towards your objectives. But most importantly, do what catches your imagination. If there is something you really want to do, some curiosity that you want to pursue, make sure that you do it, and don't let anything stand in your way.

Second, the faculty is here for you. There is no more important responsibility for any of us as members of the faculty than teaching and working with you, the students of Harvard College. One of the former young men --- I guess he's middle-aged now – who's now one of the stars of our Economics Department, was at one time a sophomore at Harvard College. He approached me and said, 'Professor Summers, the paper you wrote is really quite good, but it has a few mistakes, I'd like a job as a research assistant,' That led to an enormously productive relationship for both of us. It may not be everyone's chose approach to the faculty. But I promise you – I promise you that you will find faculty very willing to respond to your interests, to your curiosity, and to your invitations. Do not feel that you are ever wasting anyone's time pursuing your curiosity or your interest. That is what we are all here for.

The John Harvard Monument in Harvard Yard

The last thing I would say is focus on ideas. This is an extraordinary, rich, and diverse community. There are enormous opportunities of all kinds ---- extracurricular, athletic, social. Those experiences will have a huge impact on many of you. But I hope that none of you will lose sight of how special this time in your life is. It's a time to learn. It's a time to expose yourself, as you likely will only do during this period in your lifetime, to ideas that are completely different from what you have done, what you have seen , perhaps even from what you will see.

I was very struck by the story in "Time Magazine" two weeks ago about a Harvard professor in the Medical School who had been named by "Time Magazine" as, at this point, a leading researcher in cardiology in the United States. He talked about how, during his undergraduate years , he had studied English and had studied furniture because he knew that for the rest of his life, he would be studying medicine and biology. And that was a curiosity that he wanted to satisfy. And so he did, and it didn't seem to have held him back. You can focus on ideas. Remember that faculty is here for you, and pursue our passion. You, too, can be lighted on fire during your years here.

Let me conclude with one final thought, if I may. I remember very well, like it was yesterday, the day just about exactly 30 years ago today when I bid my own parents farewell after a similar ceremony at MIT. I remember the look in my parents' eyes that day, the pride in what I was going to do, the sadness that I would not be at the family breakfast table the next day, the excitement about their son's future, the apprehension about their son's future. This day does, in some ways, mark the end of one stage in the relationship between parent and child. But it also represents the beginning of a different and equally fulfilling stage in a relationship between child and parent. Students call often. Parents call back. If I may presume myself, colleagues of the class of 2005, good luck and Godspeed to us all.

From: China Campus


More......